Tired of traditional reasoning like Conan? In this month, we talked about the reasoning and case solving of entering the subconscious world to collect clues like ID:INVADED. Today, we will talk about a City Legend animation"In/Spectre"with reasoning vest. This film has opened the eyes of donglingjun. There is not only one truth. In some cases, the"truth"is not important. The"detective"satisfying the users may not tell the truth.
In/Spectre is a novel to animation. The female owner Yan yongqinzi skillfully synthesized the"God of wisdom". Entrusted by the monsters, she guest starred as a"detective"to answer questions and solve all kinds of troubles for the monsters. Male Lord sakuragawa kyuro once ate some kind of monster's meat and got abnormal ability. Two strange people who can deal with ghosts and spirits, while falling in love, work together to solve all kinds of monster events. Although they know Martial Arts (have combat effectiveness), people prefer to convince people with reason (monsters) and use fictional reasoning to eliminate urban legends.
The next time they receive a commission. A corpse throwing case in a lake alerted the God called the master of the marsh by the monster - a big snake. Big snake wants to know why the woman went to this swamp to dump her body. What does the woman mean when she said"if only it could be found smoothly". Da Shen, who was puzzled about this, invited yanyongqinzi to give her a convincing reason. The hostess gave the following reasoning.
Explain one, hide the corpse. Although according to common sense, hiding corpses will bind big stones and will not want to be found. But this is to hide the corpse. The corpse throwing woman said that if she threw it there, the big snake would eat it."If only the corpse could be found by (the big snake)", suppose the big snake likes to eat people.
The big snake is not satisfied with this explanation. The big snake said that it may not eat if it is found. The corpse throwing woman should say"if only she could be eaten smoothly".The giant snake with the essence of the bar is not low in intelligence. It has a position and can raise the bar.
Explanation 2: protect the real murderer, ask for rain and destroy clues. It's a black history. The real murderer is not the corpse throwing woman. The corpse throwing woman wants to protect the real murderer. The purpose of dumping the corpse in the swamp is to buy time and create an alibi. In addition, she also hopes that the big snake will be angry and rain and wash the traces of falling lines.
The big snake is not satisfied with this explanation. It should be said that if only the heavy rain could fall smoothly. Persistent snake.
Explain three and ask the police to help her find the lost things. The corpse thrower threw a dead baby in the swamp several years ago. Dump the body here and lie that the murder weapon is also abandoned here, and the police will search here. (child's bones) if only it could be found smoothly. Let the police find the body first, then arrest her as a murderer, and then help her find the murder weapon.
This time, the big snake recognized it,It believes that human beings are terrible and complex, and it is more willing to believe in the complex plot and reasons of dog blood.Sigh, it's not just the big snake. People don't like such a play. Simply, no one believes it and no one watches it. Why there are more and more dog blood dramas? This is not only the problem of adverse selection of bad money to expel good money, but also a lot of people like snake.The snake is satisfied with the first explanation. Is there anyone else to chase this time?
At the end of this story, Yan yongqinzi said that the first explanation is the truth, and the other explanations are all made up by himself. The first big snake didn't believe her.
In practice, the prisoner's action is not necessarily reasonable, and the big snake may have misheard what the corpse dumper said. This is very interesting. Reasonable reasoning may not lead to reliable conclusions,Because it is uncertain whether the prisoner's action is reasonable, if it does things logically, the more reliable the reasoning is, the farther it is from the truth. Even if the reasoning is reliable, the client may not be satisfied. If the information they provide is wrong, the reasoning around these information is unreliable, and you can't say that their information is wrong because they are employers.
There is a classic line in the sketch of the Spring Festival Gala:"verify a lie with a lie, and what you get must be a lie". After reading the second sentence of"In/Spectre", Dong Lingjun thinks that lies can do more things. Reasoning can be explained arbitrarily by nonsense, overthrowing lies with lies and fabricating"truth"with lies. As for the result? It's good to satisfy customers, which is beyond the common sense of detectives to seek the absolute truth.
Routine welfare: there is only one truth, but it may not be an acceptable"truth". The fabricated truth also has its meaning. This"In/Spectre"will make up what kind of wonderful reasoning, and then talk about it. The codeword is not easy. Please click in the upper left corner to pay attention.
In/Spectre: there is not only one truth, but the original"detective"reasoning can also be all lies, In/Spectre, i.e., deception. The God of wisdom meets the persistent problem of the spirit of the bar demon, so he tries to prove it
https://acg.92ylq.com/anime/in-spectre-2/
