Continue to chat about"Wasteful Days of High School Girls doing nothing", this topic, cut in class student Lili is really allergic to men? Are the results of the triad reliable? (PS: with"dry goods"at the end)
It's the fifth word. Saitama women's high school has a new story. A new transfer student, a beautiful girl of mixed blood, came to their class. The woman claimed to be allergic to men, and she was arranged next to the woman's hope in Tanaka. As soon as I came up, Tanaka Wang and Lily had an intimate contact. As a result, Lily had acne all over her body. Donglingjun began to doubt the gender of the female owner and Lily's allergy to men. Is this true?
Due to her poor initial impression, Lily wanted to change her seat away from Tanaka Wang. When he went to find the teacher, he happened to have a little contact with Sadu ZHENGJING and got a pimple again. It's true that you're allergic to men.
However, Tanaka Wang resents this matter."isn't this her mother saying that I'm not a girl? Or she treated me like a man. So she expanded and classified men to find out what Lily was allergic to.
This expansion is obviously meaningless. Even if she finds out, she can't get rid of the suspicion that she has too much"male characteristics". Fortunately, she has a close friend. Lugong Shizhi puts forward a psychological hypothesis to settle this matter.
She assumed this:"lily is more like a male phobia than an allergy to men. In her understanding, men will threaten themselves. On the contrary, as long as they do not have this understanding, they will not attack."If this hypothesis is confirmed, it can be explained that Lily is not allergic to men, but to"threat". Lily will feel threatened when she sees Tanaka Wang. It has nothing to do with whether she is a man or not.
Nicknamed"robot", she really likes Microbiology and research knowledge. The sister made decent assumptions and explanations. Now we come to the experiment. How to prove Lily's hypothesis?
She took out her eye mask to carry out"blind test", which is really a blind test worthy of the name. She covered her eyes and contacted three girls in turn. If there was no allergic reaction, it means that she was not allergic to Tanaka's gender, but too sensitive to the threat brought by her aura.
The results of the test were amazing. Lily was allergic when she came into contact with Tanaka Wang's hand. Lily claims to feel a slippery hand, big and slippery, African giant frog. After experiments, Tanaka is an amphibian, which seems to be full of evidence.
But is this test reliable? Think carefully, the experiment is still flawed. It seems to be a qualified single blind test, but the subjects have been in contact with the tested object before and have subjective impression interference. This will affect the test results.
For example, you are used to the dishes made by your mother. In your heart, you think that the dishes made by your mother taste the best. Then you cover your eyes and eat two dishes. Then the taste is more like the dish made by your mother, and you will probably win. Because I already have a subjective attitude in my mind.
The same is true for this experiment in animation. Lily has touched Tanaka's hand before, and the impression and feedback loop have been established. Touch it again, there will be a reaction, which is not enough to prove Tanaka's"amphibious"characteristics.
In the animation, lily also had problems touching her hand. She's guessing who the touch is based on the touch? And she knew who would take part in the test. As a result, the interference of subjective judgment is particularly large. The experiment was disguised as blindfolded. Guess who touched it? It has nothing to do with allergies.
There is also a problem with the test sequence. The first two people did not have allergic reactions, and she knows that there are only three people. If it were me, I would know that the third person must be Tanaka Wang, who has both impression and trouble with Tanaka Wang.
The above three flaws are enough to overturn the test results. What donglingjun wants to say is how difficult it is to design a reliable experiment. It's not enough to just look at the test results. It's more interesting to think about why the test is designed like this and see the test process.
Well, Tanaka is an"amphibian", and the test result was overturned. Then let's relax. It's time to send"dry goods"at the end. Why is Lily so impressed with the hand"Tanaka Wang"that she can feel the slippery feeling (the touch of frog skin)? Donglingjue's"spoof"explanation is that Tanaka didn't wash her hands after eating potato chips. Yes, she didn't pay attention to hygiene and didn't wash her hands. If you don't believe it, you can try. Isn't it sticky and slippery without washing your hands after eating potato chips. It can also be pushed down. Lily has a habit of cleanliness. How can this be proved? Welcome to design the experiment.
Routine welfare: the fifth word of Wasteful Days of High School Girls tells us that if you are a sister and don't want to be treated as a man, it is necessary to pay attention to personal hygiene. Design experiment is a technical activity. Friends who want to dig deeply can see single blind experiment, double-blind experiment and three busy experiment. Those who are too lazy to dig deeply can go back to the third sentence of"Kaguya-sama: Love Is War", where there is a reference to"survivor bias", which is about the selection of test samples, and it is also very interesting. The codeword is not easy. Please pay attention to it. We're not just talking about animation, we're practicing our brains.
